|
 
 |
| LETTER TO EDITOR |
|
| Year : 2016 | Volume
: 1
| Issue : 2 | Page : 92 |
|
Author's reply
Shivaram Chandrashekar
Consultant and Head Department of Transfusion Medicine, Manipal Hospitals, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| Date of Web Publication | 6-Sep-2016 |
Correspondence Address:
Shivaram Chandrashekar
Consultant and Head Department of Transfusion Medicine, Manipal Hospitals, Bengaluru, Karnataka
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/2455-8893.189860
How to cite this article:
Chandrashekar S. Author's reply. Glob J Transfus Med 2016;1:92 |
“The author is of the opinion that non availability of a well co-ordinated centralized blood transfusion system should not be a deterrent to taking small steps at improving quality at the blood centre level. While this may not lead to a giant leap, it will certainly be a step forward. Many such small steps (quality initiatives) by many blood banks will force the authorities to act and bring about the necessary changes in legislation, which are usually a long drawn affair running into decades. The goal of the author is to encourage blood bankers to do what's within their reach, instead of waiting for an ideal system”.[1],[2]
| References | |  |
|
Search Pubmed for